Search results
Create the page "Admin" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- <nowiki>1[ 2013] LLR 607, Admin Ct. </nowiki>6 KB (1,006 words) - 13:26, 26 August 2018
- <nowiki>Appeal from Wilcock v Lancaster City Council [2013] EWHC 1231 (Admin) (11 April 2013)</nowiki> <nowiki>1[ 2013] LLR 607, Admin Ct. </nowiki>5 KB (829 words) - 13:23, 26 August 2018
Page text matches
- ...nse condition<nowiki>. (Wilcock v Lancaster City Council [2013] EWHC 1231 (Admin) (11 April 2013)) permission to appeal refused on the papers.</nowiki> * [[Wilcock v Lancaster City Council 2013 LLR 607, Admin Ct]]4 KB (601 words) - 21:45, 24 November 2018
- ...were decided in Stockton-On-Tees Borough Council v Latif [2009] EWHC 228 (Admin) (13 February 2009) (See pages </nowiki>)17 KB (2,825 words) - 08:20, 21 August 2018
- ...were decided in Stockton-On-Tees Borough Council v Latif [2009] EWHC 228 (Admin) (13 February 2009) (See page 195)</nowiki> ...were decided in Stockton-On-Tees Borough Council v Latif [2009] EWHC 228 (Admin) (13 February 2009) (See pages </nowiki>)35 KB (5,839 words) - 04:49, 21 August 2018
- ...has raised the case of Wilcock v Lancaster City Council [2013] EWHC 1231 (Admin) (11 April 2013) which is authority for the proposition that section 68 of13 KB (2,186 words) - 14:25, 22 August 2018
- <nowiki>Neutral Citation Number: [2009] EWHC 228 (Admin)</nowiki> ...he first was The District Court of Vilnius City v. Barcys [2007] EWHC 615 (Admin). The statutory provision under consideration as the Extradition Act 2003 w16 KB (2,659 words) - 14:41, 22 August 2018
- MR. COLVIN: You've got to go to the Admin Court, or engage in the political process; these councillors are democratic47 KB (8,526 words) - 11:05, 16 October 2018
- ...decided in the case of Wilcock v Lancaster City Council [2013] EWHC 1231 (Admin) that there is no reason why s.68 should be confined to cases of unroadwort6 KB (1,009 words) - 07:44, 21 August 2018
- [[Image:]][[Image:]]PTA Template 269E1 - OCT16 - JR (Admin)4 KB (644 words) - 06:41, 16 July 2018
- '''<nowiki>[2017] EWHC 3002 (Admin)</nowiki>''' ...tion of Westminster City Council) v Middlesex Crown Court [2002] EWHC 1104 Admin, Scott Baker J (para.21) considered the question as to how a Crown Court (o11 KB (1,807 words) - 19:44, 18 February 2019
- ...any license condition. (Wilcock v Lancaster City Council [2013] EWHC 1231 (Admin) (11 April 2013)) permission to appeal refused on the papers. </nowiki>7 KB (1,048 words) - 13:15, 28 October 2018
- ...discretion. You can contact us using the following email address: '''admin@misconductinpublicoffice.org''' ...your password or account, you must tell us as soon as possible by emailing admin@misconductinpublicoffice.com.14 KB (2,352 words) - 06:37, 5 July 2018
- <nowiki>1[ 2013] LLR 607, Admin Ct. </nowiki>6 KB (1,006 words) - 13:26, 26 August 2018
- <nowiki>Appeal from Wilcock v Lancaster City Council [2013] EWHC 1231 (Admin) (11 April 2013)</nowiki> <nowiki>1[ 2013] LLR 607, Admin Ct. </nowiki>5 KB (829 words) - 13:23, 26 August 2018
- ...</nowiki>''(R (Wandsworth LBC) v SoS for Transport<nowiki> [2005] EWHC 20 (Admin) per </nowiki> ...h disclosure and PII issues: [2009]EWHC 1687 (Admin) and [2009] EWHC 2387 (Admin). </nowiki>The Court found that the SoS ''<nowiki>“consistently and repea24 KB (3,746 words) - 13:30, 26 August 2018